The smart Trick of audit 177 4 case laws That Nobody is Discussing
The smart Trick of audit 177 4 case laws That Nobody is Discussing
Blog Article
III) While in the version with the father of deceased namely Muhammad Iqbal (complainant of second version) fatal injury was attributed to Allah Ditta son of Haqnawaz and role attributed to your petitioner and others was simple existence with aerial firing without any injury to deceased or PWs.
The main target is about the intention to cause injury. This is a major challenge: a very low threshold for an offence carrying the death penalty.
four. It's been noticed by this Court that there can be a delay of someday in the registration of FIR which hasn't been explained via the complainant. Moreover, there is not any eye-witness in the alleged incidence as well as the prosecution is counting on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession of the petitioners is tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of these namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram transpired to get the real brothers of the deceased but they did not react in any respect into the confessional statements from the petitioners and calmly observed them leaving, one particular after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not glimpse much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on 14.02.2018 and there is no explanation regarding why her arrest wasn't effected after making on the alleged extra judicial confession. It has been held on numerous occasions that extra judicial confession of an accused is really a weak style of evidence which might be manoeuvred by the prosecution in almost any case where direct connecting evidence does not occur their way. The prosecution is usually depending on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal didn't say a word concerning existence of some light on the place, where they allegedly observed the petitioners with each other on the motorcycle at four.
maintaining the conviction awarded to the appellant reduce the sentence with the appellant from imprisonment for life to 1 already undergone(Pakistan Penal Code)
It is now nicely-settled that considerations for pre-arrest and post-arrest bail are entirely different, therefore, in our view the learned Judge experienced fallen in error to cancel the bail allowed to petitioner from the same Additional Sessions Judge.”
In this blog site post, we will delve into the details of Section 302 PPC, Checking out its provisions as well as gravity of its punishment.
73 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Relating the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 of the Industrial Relations read more Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice isn't served, the grievance petition may be dismissed. This is because service from the grievance notice is actually a mandatory necessity along with a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The regulation necessitates that a grievance notice be served over the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. In the event the employer fails to reply or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) If your organization is transprovincial.
The appellant should have remained vigilant and raised his challenge into the Judgment within time. Read more
nine. Needless to mention that any observations made in the above mentioned order are tentative in nature and shall not influence the trial Court.
two. I have listened to the uncovered counsel for that parties along with realized DPG at size, perused the record and observed that:-
Preserving Social Order: By imposing strict penalties for murder, Section 302 PPC reinforces the principle of social order and security. It demonstrates the commitment with the state to protect its citizens and copyright the rule of legislation.
The case of *R v. Ahmed* exemplifies the practical application of this amendment and its probable to safe economic interests and maintain the integrity of the national currency. As legal practitioners and citizens, a comprehensive grasp of those changes is important for upholding the principles of justice and contributing to a sturdy legal system.
Try to look for websites affiliated with respected legal institutions or organizations. Confirm the information against other sources when probable.
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials performing within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case regulation previously rendered on similar cases.